Naming aside, Generation 9 graphics comes with some interesting enhancements. So which is better, HD 530 or HD 5200? At this point it will already create a miasma of uncertainty, probably exaggerated until we get a definite explanation of the stack nomenclature. While you could argue that 5 is more than 4, but we already have HD 5200, HD 5500, Iris 6100 and others. Personally we find that it adds more confusion, because the HD 4600 naming is not directly linked to the HD 530 naming. HD4600) to a three digit (HD 530) arrangement in order "to minimize confusion" (direct quote).
We have been told directly by Intel that they have changed their graphics naming scheme from a four digit (e.g. We can confirm that this is a 24 EU design, and this most likely follows on from Intel’s 8 th Generation graphics in the sense that we have a base GT2 design featuring three sub-slices of 8 EUs each.Īs far as we can tell, Intel calls the HD 530 graphics part of its 9 th Generation (i.e. This is different than what GPU-Z indicates, which points to a 48 EU design instead, although GPU-Z is not often correct on newer graphics modules before launch day. Querying HD 530 via Intel's OpenCL driver reports a 24 EU design running at 1150 MHz. Not coming up with many details, we did the obvious thing – check what information comes directly out of the processor. When I first heard the name, alarm bells went off in my head with questions: why is the name different, has the architecture changed, and what does this mean fundamentally? Both the Skylake processors here use Intel’s HD 530 graphics solution.
0 kommentar(er)
